Today’s Sponsor
💵 Today’s Top Stories
Credit score

Does your credit score beat the average for your generation? New Experian data shows an 81-point gap between the youngest and oldest adults. Read more.

Aldi

A nutcracker for $9.99, potted Christmas porch trees for $29.99 and Christmas dish cloths for $4.99 are just a few of the great deals you can find at Aldi this month. Read more.

Metal credit cards can be cool to use but aren’t as easy to destroy. Team Clark gives you eight ways you can destroy or dispose of metal cards. Read more.

Metro by T-Mobile saves some of its cheapest plans for customers who switch online and bring their own phone. You’ll skip the $25 in-store activation fee, too. Here’s how to see if your phone qualifies. Read more.

💸 Ask Clark
Clark Howard
Ask Clark Howard

On his podcast, Clark Howard answers real reader questions on money, credit, debt, retirement, travel, and more, along with co-host Christa DiBiase.

 
Today's question
   
Julie in Oregon asks:
"Two financial institutions recently asked for my full Social Security number over the phone to verify my account, claiming it’s a new regulation. I pushed back and verified another way, but am I wrong to refuse to give out my full SSN?"

Clark's answer: Providing your Social Security number — or an EIN for a corporate account — is a standard regulatory requirement only when you are initially opening an account. For everyday verification, this is terrible practice, and I hate it when regulated industries like banking hide behind the excuse that it's some "new regulation."

It puts customers directly in harm's way. If you fall for a pretext call from an imposter pretending to be your bank, give them your Social Security number, and have money stolen from your account, the bank will turn around and say, "Well, you willingly handed over your credentials, so you aren't covered by our fraud protection," and your money is gone. Banks cannot be sending mixed messages like this.

Do not give them your full Social Security number. Honestly, I don't even like it when they ask for the last four digits.

Submit a question for Clark
📊 Stat of the Day
❝

📦 $117.50: Holiday gift givers sending bulky presents could face seasonal oversize surcharges of up to $117.50 per package at UPS and FedEx this year. All three major shipping carriers — including the USPS, which added temporary fees between $0.50 and $1.25 on standard boxes — have implemented peak-season rate increases to manage surging volume through mid-January 2027. Compare online shipping calculator rates, avoid oversized boxes, and mail packages early to skip expensive expedited delivery fees.

💰 Deal Alert: Today’s Top Deals
🎙 Podcast

Want more ways to keep more of your hard-earned money? Head over to the Clark Howard YouTube channel for fresh money-saving tips, consumer warnings, and straight-talking financial advice.

☎ Need Money Help?

The Team Clark Consumer Action Center is a free helpline that can help you navigate your money questions. Call 636-492-5275. Visit clark.com/cac for more information.

Did You Enjoy Today’s Newsletter?

Let us know what you think so we can better serve you!

Login or Subscribe to participate